|
Post by czb on Mar 21, 2023 20:42:14 GMT
except for the issue with their ages... they are pretty young.
and camilla's grandkids are being included so i would bet that is annoying to harry ....
|
|
|
Post by lindsaywhit on Mar 21, 2023 22:38:16 GMT
OMG, I'm sick of all of them! I don't even like Charles but let him have his effing coronation day - he's been an intern for 50 years!
|
|
|
Post by sputnik on Mar 22, 2023 0:52:34 GMT
except for the issue with their ages... they are pretty young.
and camilla's grandkids are being included so i would bet that is annoying to harry .... this. there's no reason to involve toddlers in this. just have a photo op of them with charles for posterity and that should be more than enough. louis, who's older, was excluded from a lot of the jubilee stuff for the same reason and when he was included he was a total brat
|
|
|
Post by o0amber0o on Mar 22, 2023 1:44:31 GMT
I for one am aghast that coronation invitations come in the form of e-mail!
Seems like something a proper paper invitation should be sent out for.
|
|
|
Post by cornflakegrl on Mar 22, 2023 1:54:18 GMT
OMG, I'm sick of all of them! I don't even like Charles but let him have his effing coronation day - he's been an intern for 50 years! The 50 year intern made me laugh! Who knows how much of this is actually coming from the Meg and Harry camp but the lack of acceptance of the invite does seem weird. I think what bothers me most about Meg and Harry is stuff like this. Every situation is somehow about them and the persecution they face. Even if it's nothing more than normal protocol or part of the life of being a royal.
|
|
|
Post by shellee on Mar 22, 2023 2:20:29 GMT
Meg and Harry’s kids are too young for crying out loud. Isn’t Louis excluded too? I do think that Harry and Meg should be on the balcony however.
|
|
trixie
OGs
stuck in the middle with you...
Posts: 2,105
|
Post by trixie on Mar 22, 2023 2:37:23 GMT
Is Louie involved? Or just Charlotte and George?
H&M's kids are a lot younger but so is Louie, and known to be disruptive.
|
|
|
Post by sleuth on Mar 22, 2023 4:48:52 GMT
I guess they feel ready to serve their kids up on that silver platter since all of their lies and insinuations are unravelling. Desperate times.
|
|
|
Post by czb on Mar 22, 2023 14:46:39 GMT
^^^ you say that, but have you seen pap shots of their kids? don't see them being 'served up'.
|
|
|
Post by lindsaywhit on Mar 22, 2023 15:30:27 GMT
Meg and Harry’s kids are too young for crying out loud. Isn’t Louis excluded too? I do think that Harry and Meg should be on the balcony however. Yes this. It is the sane and simple solution. Which of course means they'll all spit and hiss about it to ridiculous lengths. God, they (entire bunch) are exhausting, but then what else can we expect from all that inbreeding? As for Meghan, I honestly think she has now been triggered so deeply by their casual but entrenched racism that she will have a knee-jerk negative reaction to whatever the royal assholes and the courtiers that surround and control them say or do about her. Meanwhile, Harry's nightmare is history repeating itself. You know, when Charles walked Meghan down the aisle, I had such high hopes for the future of the royal family. It truly made me almost giddy - and I think a lot of people, particularly people of colour, in the Commonwealth countries and the world felt the same way. It didn't take but a minute to explode into ugly and soul-crushing again, but for that "one brief shining moment" it almost felt like Camelot.
|
|
|
Post by ❤️ NickiDrea ❤️ on Mar 22, 2023 17:20:40 GMT
People are jumping all over them over a rumor. An unsubstantiated rumor. This after Meghan and Harry told us that they will never brief the British press about anything… this rumor is coming from the Sun of all papers.
Surprise surprise about the allegations that they are making “demands.” Sounds like the same rumors that KP was spreading before. From the same sources as before too.
|
|
|
Post by sleuth on Mar 23, 2023 12:08:18 GMT
^^^ you say that, but have you seen pap shots of their kids? don't see them being 'served up'. Well yes I have.. but my comment was actually referring to them feeling more comfortable to serve them up on a platter at the Coronation (if they are actually demanding that). I didnt think they wanted that life for their children. I also think that they would have a better reception by the public if the children were with them. Like a buffer. Makes sense from PR point of view.
|
|
|
Post by charmedhour on Mar 23, 2023 12:43:06 GMT
"Specifically, that their children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet, are included in the ceremony" Which is reasonable when you know that Bill & Kathy's kids are being included. Along with Camilla's grandchildren.
|
|
|
Post by czb on Mar 23, 2023 16:56:17 GMT
^^^ you say that, but have you seen pap shots of their kids? don't see them being 'served up'. Well yes I have.. but my comment was actually referring to them feeling more comfortable to serve them up on a platter at the Coronation (if they are actually demanding that). I didnt think they wanted that life for their children. I also think that they would have a better reception by the public if the children were with them. Like a buffer. Makes sense from PR point of view. you have? i haven't seen any pap shots.
|
|
|
Post by sputnik on Mar 23, 2023 18:15:57 GMT
neither have i. can you share them? i'm curious what they look like these days. so far all i've seen are the photos they release for christmas cards, their netflix show, etc.
|
|