|
|
Post by notoriousmkg on Jan 21, 2022 5:26:12 GMT
One interesting thing I read, that made me think: The bitterness Britney wrote about how she was denied the ability to tour small venues with her own songs and remixes, yet Jamie Lynn was granted that very same thing. I imagine that the business managers saw that as wasting millions--why get peanuts from small clubs/venues when Britney can sell out Vegas shows. Yes, it's greedy but also makes a lot of financial sense. Like putting millions into checking accounts that earn little interest versus higher-yielding investments. When was Britney wanting to do the small venues? Before or after the conservatorship was established? Before the conservatorship, her father had no control whether or where she performed or what the playlist would be. Since Jamie Lynn was not under a conservatorship, how were they able to control what she did or not? |
|
