All Britney All the Time Thread

[trixie]

Somebody had to start it. 

[burnt_toast]

Weren't there some nakked IG posts recently? I gotta CATCH UP.

[beeyotch]

Gawd, I only know about it because Novice posted about it but I'm embarrassed on her behalf. Nekkid IG posts is so...thirsty and terrible judgment.

[MsDark]

Well I hate to say it, but all these fantards who were probably still in diapers when she went pink wig are about to find out why she ended up under a damn conservatorship in the first place.

Not that this particular conservatorship wasn't shady as all get out.  Obvs something needed to change. But they threw the whole baby out with the bathwater here.   

[aabbcc]

My daughter, who was fairly young during the infamous meltdown, strongly disagreed with her Free Britney peers. Her comment to me: You only have to look at her Instagram to know she's not all there.

[trixie]

You raised a smart kid, aabbcc. Congrats!

[Sarzy]

Britney Spears says she will sue her sister Jamie Lynn, if she continues to make "derogatory" statements about her while promoting a new book.

In a cease and desist letter, Britney's lawyer Matthew Rosengart claims that the "ill-timed" memoir contains several "misleading or outrageous claims".

Although Britney has not read the book, she believes her sister has "exploited her for monetary gain," he said.

"She will not tolerate it, nor should she," the letter continued.

Jamie Lynn has not yet publicly commented on the letter.

"Publicly airing false or fantastical grievances is wrong, especially when designed to sell books. It is also potentially unlawful and defamatory," Rosengart warns in the letter.

"You recently reportedly stated that the book was 'not about her.' She takes you at your word and we, therefore, demand that you cease and desist from referencing Britney derogatorily during your promotional campaign.

"If you fail to do so or defame her, Britney will be forced to consider and take all appropriate legal action."

Spears sisters get embroiled in public feudJamie Lynn Spears speaks up for sister BritneyThe Britney Spears conservatorship case explained

Britney and her sister have been engaged in a battle of words ever since Jamie Lynn appeared on Good Morning America to promote her book, Things I Should Have Said, last week.

The book reportedly details her own life story, including her young daughter's near-fatal accident in 2017, her relationship with Britney and the role she played in the singer's controversial conservatorship.

During the interview, Jamie Lynn described herself as "my sister's biggest supporter" and said she "took steps to help" end the conservatorship.

But according to ABC, she also describes Britney's past behaviour in the book as "erratic", "paranoid" and "spiralling".

www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-60051796

[tulip]

If Jamie Lynn weren't Britney's sister, no one would care about her.

This family is such a mess.

[trixie]

Yeah, no one cares. I don't know why she decided to write this book now, other than she saw the gravy train ending and decided to cash in. But the book pretty much guarantees she won't see another dime from Brit. I know she tried her hand at being a country singer (fail) and I guess she's on some Netflix show now called Sweet Magnolias. Never saw it, probably never will. Minor stardom is the best she could ever wish for so I guess she's going for it.

[inigomontoya]

I don’t think (and I am not a Britney super fan) any of her immediate family have had her best interests at heart for quite some time.

[trixie]

^ Cash cow syndrome.
Mix in hillbilly family = disaster.

[beeyotch]

One interesting thing I read, that made me think: The bitterness Britney wrote about how she was denied the ability to tour small venues with her own songs and remixes, yet Jamie Lynn was granted that very same thing. I imagine that the business managers saw that as wasting millions--why get peanuts from small clubs/venues when Britney can sell out Vegas shows. Yes, it's greedy but also makes a lot of financial sense. Like putting millions into checking accounts that earn little interest versus higher-yielding investments.

Yet giving Jamie Lynn the same rights is maxing out her earning potential, because she's never going to sell out arenas.

Should they have let Britney sell herself short for the sake of keeping their golden goose happy? I want to say yes, but also realize how that would leave millions on the table. Not just for the managers and host of others who profit from her career, but Britney herself. She's no Cher, she can't keep performing forever. It's just good financial planning. So I appreciate the difficulty of the situation.

[MsDark]

They could've let her do it at least every once in a blue moon just to keep her happy. And believe me, her fans would have appreciated it. They also could have gotten a lot of mileage out of it.

They're just greedy shits who gave zero fucks about keeping her happy. Just medicated and behaving. Which is fine, but damn. At least let her have a little happy every now and then.

I mean, you're basically dealing with an overgrown teenager here.  Even that back and forth on insta now that she's free to rant on social media...she sounds exactly like a teenager.

[kittylady]

I see that the latest is that Dad of the Year has just lost a motion in court to have Brit's medical records made public. Not disclosed to the judge as part of his defense but God damn PUBLIC.

Whatever has, is or will go on in the future with her, there's no need to have her medical records splashed across the tabloids. Nobody but her doctors needs to know what meds she was on, what the outcome of sessions and rehab were, what birth control she used or any of it. Having said that, I wouldn't put it past Jamie to somehow have copies that will somehow 'leak' -it just depends on which tabloid sites are willing to risk their neck to run with it.

[MsDark]

Sharing her medical information without her consent is illegal.